• About
    About
  • Architecture
    Architecture
  • Planning
    Planning
  • Shelter Journal
    Shelter Journal
  • Contact
    Contact
Contact Info
Office:
16 North 4th Street
Carbondale, CO 81623

Mailing:
PO Box 550
Carbondale, CO 81623
+1 970 963 0201
info@landandshelter.com
Newsletter
Our Instagram
This error message is only visible to WordPress admins
Error: No posts found.
logo
  • About
    About
  • Architecture
    Architecture
  • Planning
    Planning
  • Shelter Journal
    Shelter Journal
  • Contact
    Contact
logo
logo

SHELTER JOURNAL

A diary on the practice of thoughtful architecture.
67B39B12-B8D8-43F4-B128-68D95F3FC45B

Language Troubles

December 11, 2019
-
3 Comments

Words like traditional, contemporary, ultra-modern, even green, get used all the time and I don’t think we know what these words mean to one another. This is the trouble with language in general, and I think with architecture it has special vehemence. I wish we had a richer common language around architecture. 

Take this exchange: 

       Me: I would love to do more minimal residential work. 

       Friend: Do you really want to do ultra-modern design?

       (distaste implied)

I didn’t use the world ultra-modern, yet it sprung to my friend’s mind when I said minimal. It caused me to think deeply about why and how those two words got hitched together in the cultural vernacular to mean the same thing, while an architect would draw a distinction. 

This conversation was one of many in which I noticed that architecture splits into two buckets, modern and everything else. When minimal became ultra-modern, it took on the tableau that modern sometimes inhabits: bad, cold, inhumane, impractical, not-buildable, showy. It means it doesn’t feel good. Modern is a binary in these moments. How did “modern” – something that calls a point in time – today, now, current – somehow turn into – bad, cold, inhumane? Does this happen in other professions? What is modern medicine? modern law?

And why on earth do we use this word “modern” so carelessly? (We all of us, including the architects, have created a meaningless word).

I dislike how everyone (including us architects) talk about buildings as either modern or not-modern. 

I might say to my friend:

I would love to do more work with quiet meditative forms and refined detailing that minimizes clutter. Architecture that feels calm and meditative. Architecture that is the spatial equivalent to the weather on a perfect morning in June. Nothing to add, nothing to take away. Just a deep sense of well-being. I would like to do more of that. 

And I’m still not sure if she would have any more of a mental image, or if that is possible with words. I hope I would move the peg off the reductive and negative connotations. That’s what I’d like. 

3 Comments

on Language Troubles.
  1. Mike Cuseo
    December 11, 2019 @ 9:57 pm
    -
    Reply

    Love this!

  2. erin
    December 12, 2019 @ 7:31 pm
    -
    Reply

    Great Point!

  3. Emily
    December 29, 2019 @ 2:14 am
    -
    Reply

    In healthcare “modern medicine” is “western medicine” and has a positive connotation for most, implying that is based on science versus tradition.

Leave a Comment

Your feedback is valuable for us. Your email will not be published.
Cancel Reply

Please wait...
Submit Comment →

Previous Posts

Nov 2, 2020

Remote Studio

Sep 21, 2020

Where is L+S?

Feb 4, 2020

Options

Nov 13, 2019

Talk About Bricks

Oct 21, 2019

Images Should Follow Not lead + Intro to Shelter Journal

Oct 7, 2019

Regulating Green

Sep 20, 2019

On Names

Aug 15, 2019

Sea Glass

Jul 14, 2019

The Log Challenge

Jul 10, 2019

Design “Team”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Language Troubles | Land+Shelter